More Powerful. More Efficient. Built for Complex Quality Scenarios.

Following its recognition as a Recommended SPC Software in 2025, Bingo SPC is proud to announce the official release of SPC 4.0 in early 2026.
This major upgrade represents a significant leap forward—not only in statistical rigor, but also in operational efficiency, system scalability, and enterprise-grade usability. SPC 4.0 is designed to support more complex manufacturing scenarios while delivering faster insights and stronger process control.
SPC 4.0 Is Ready
SPC 4.0 is now fully available.
We recommend starting with the enhanced CPK six-in-one analysis report and the new Statistical Dashboard to experience the most significant improvements firsthand.
In the pharmaceutical industry, the consequences of quality issues extend far beyond economic loss. They directly affect patient safety and expose companies to significant regulatory and compliance risks.
Compared with other manufacturing sectors, pharmaceutical production has several defining characteristics:
Highly complex processes with numerous variables
Extremely stringent quality requirements with minimal allowable variability
Any abnormality may result in batch rejection, production shutdowns, or product recalls
Strict regulatory oversight under frameworks such as GMP and authorities including the NMPA, FDA, and EMA



As a result, the core challenge of pharmaceutical quality management is not simply whether a product meets specifications, but whether:
This is precisely where Statistical Process Control (SPC) delivers its fundamental value in the pharmaceutical industry.
In pharmaceutical manufacturing, SPC is far more than a basic statistical quality tool. It serves as:
A critical method for maintaining continuous process control
A key data foundation within GMP systems
A vital bridge connecting processes, equipment, quality, and regulatory compliance
By continuously monitoring Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), SPC enables pharmaceutical companies to:
Detect abnormal trends at an early stage
Prevent deviations from escalating into quality incidents
Provide objective, data-driven evidence for deviation investigations and CAPA activities
In active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and finished dosage manufacturing, SPC is commonly applied to monitor:
Key physicochemical attributes of raw and excipient materials
Particle size distribution and moisture content
Weighing accuracy and variability
SPC allows early identification of abnormal fluctuations in raw materials or pre-processing steps, preventing issues from propagating downstream into subsequent processes.

In solid and liquid dosage form manufacturing, SPC is widely used to monitor:
Mixing time and blend uniformity
Tablet weight, hardness, and thickness
Fill volume accuracy and sealing quality
SPC helps distinguish between:
Random variation, and
Systematic shifts or equipment-related abnormalities,
thereby reducing batch-to-batch variability and ensuring consistent product quality.

For sterile products and biopharmaceutical manufacturing, SPC plays a particularly critical role in monitoring:
Environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, microbial levels, particle counts)
Sterilization process parameters
Operating status of critical equipment
Trend-based control charts enable early detection of potential loss-of-control conditions, helping prevent sterility failures before they occur.

During the packaging stage, SPC is commonly applied to:
Fill consistency
Seal integrity
Label positioning and readability
Effective process control at this stage significantly reduces compliance risks related to mislabeling, underfilling, or packaging defects.

SPC data is frequently used to support:
GMP audits and inspections
Deviation investigations
Verification of CAPA effectiveness
By translating abstract GMP requirements into measurable and continuously monitored process indicators, SPC plays a critical role across all quality assurance activities. Data integrity, traceability, and audit readiness are especially essential.
In pharmaceutical manufacturing, many quality risks do not arise from isolated out-of-specification events, but from:
Gradual and long-term process drift.
SPC trend analysis enables proactive intervention before deviations formally occur.
SPC is often implemented in conjunction with:
Process Validation (PV)
Continued Process Verification (CPV)
forming a core component of lifecycle process management.
Improved process stability and product consistency
Reduced risk of batch deviations and product rejection
Stronger support for GMP compliance and regulatory audits
More efficient deviation handling and CAPA execution
Establishment of a data-driven quality culture
As regulatory expectations continue to increase, SPC has evolved from an optional tool into a foundational capability within pharmaceutical quality systems.
In the pharmaceutical industry:
Compliance is the baseline. Stability is the core. Data is the safeguard.
Through continuous monitoring and trend analysis, SPC enables manufacturers to take action before problems occur—protecting patient safety, reducing operational risk, and supporting long-term, stable production.
Truly mature pharmaceutical manufacturing does not rely on end-product testing alone, but on controlled and predictable processes.
The automotive industry is characterized by a large number of parts, complex processes, and extremely high quality requirements. A complete vehicle often consists of tens of thousands of parts, involving stamping, welding, painting, final assembly, and the production of numerous outsourced parts. Fluctuations in any stage can be amplified into batch quality problems, leading to high risks of rework, claims, and even recalls.
SPC (Statistical Process Control) is a quality management method developed to address the issues of process stability, controllable fluctuations, and early detection of anomalies. It is not a post-event inspection but a process prevention management tool, which aligns perfectly with the automotive industry's pursuit of "zero defects" and "continuous improvement."

* Sheet length, width, hole dimensions
* Flatness, warpage
* Burr height
* Monitor die wear trends in real time
* Detect equipment anomalies early
* Avoid batch defects caused by dimensional drift
* Reduce unplanned die downtime
* Extend die life
* Reduce first and final inspection pressure
* Weld strength
* Weld position deviation
* Number of welds
* Measurement control charts (Xbar-R): Weld pull-out force
* Count control charts (P-chart / U-chart): Welding defect rate
* Identify welding torch wear and current fluctuations
* Prevent structural strength defects
* Meet OEM audit requirements (e.g., VDA, IATF 16949)
* Film thickness
* Gloss
* Color difference (ΔE)
* Defect rates such as particles and runs
* Monitor changes in painting equipment and environment
* Analyze the impact of temperature and humidity on painting quality
* Reduce repainting and repair costs
* Tightening torque
* Gap surface difference
* Assembly dimensions
* Determine whether the process has long-term stable supply capabilities
* Support mass production release (PPAP) for new projects
* Provide quantitative basis for continuous improvement
In the automotive industry, SPC has long since extended from the shop floor to the supply chain:
* Requires suppliers to submit control charts and capability indices
* Remotely monitors quality trends of key components
* Anomalous data triggers early warnings and a closed-loop rectification process.
* Reducing incoming material inspection costs
* Preventing defective materials from entering the factory
* Improving the overall quality level of the supply chain
* Proactive problem detection
* Reducing rework
* Anomalies are supported by evidence
* Improvements are quantifiable
* IATF 16949

* VDA 6.3

— Man: Are operators properly trained? Are key personnel certified? Are personnel changes controlled?
— Machine: Are key equipment identified? Is equipment status stable? Are equipment inspections and maintenance in place?
— Material: Are incoming materials controlled? Is batch and traceability clear? Are non-conforming materials effectively isolated?
— Method: Are the work instructions the latest version? Are actual operations consistent? Are error-proofing measures effective?
— Measurement: Are the testing equipment calibrated? Are the testing methods reliable? Is SPC used for process monitoring? (Key point)
— Environment: Are temperature and humidity controlled? Does cleanliness meet requirements? Do environmental changes affect quality?
* Reduce scrap rate
* Reduce downtime risk
* Improve delivery stability
* Data collection relies on manual methods, resulting in insufficient timeliness.
* Control charts are drawn but not used, lacking closed-loop management.
* Non-normal data leads to CPK distortion.
* SPC software functions are disconnected from on-site operations.
* Promote automated data collection and systematic SPC.
* Establish a closed-loop mechanism of "alarm-analysis-rectification-verification".
* Introduce non-normal capability analysis and data transformation methods.
* Integrate SPC into daily production management, not just for auditing.
In the automotive industry, the cost of quality problems is often exponentially amplified. SPC is not just a control chart, but a data-driven process management philosophy.
Whoever can detect fluctuations earlier can eliminate risks earlier; whoever can truly utilize SPC can maintain stability and reliability in fierce competition.
In the field of quality management, traditional Statistical Process Control (SPC) often faces the dual challenges of "data silos" and "analysis lag." With the deepening of industrial digitalization, we believe that SPC should not be merely a drawing tool, but rather a real-time pulse connecting the production site and management decisions.
The system adopts a B/S architecture, achieving seamless integration from data generation to chart feedback. Through integrated HTTP, MQTT, TCP, OPC, and other interface protocols, data from sensors or detection equipment on the production line can be synchronized to the system in real time. This mechanism ensures that control charts are updated automatically without manual refresh when the page is open, truly transforming quality control from "post-event statistics" to "process prevention."

To meet the quality management needs at different levels, we have designed three types of core monitoring dashboards, supporting the creation of an unlimited number of display pages:
• Dynamic Dashboard: Designed specifically for production workstations, it is projected onto the workshop's large screen via an independent URL. Data changes in real time as it flows in from the inspection points, allowing frontline personnel to immediately grasp the stability of the process.

• Integrated Dashboard: Supports cross-process configuration, allowing control charts, rainbow charts, or histograms of different testing items to be freely combined in the same view, enabling centralized monitoring of complex processes.

• Statistical Dashboard: Provides data summaries for management, intuitively displaying daily alarm rates, number of updated detection items, and anomaly lists, identifying systemic quality risks from a global perspective.

A robust backend monitoring service is the core of the system's proactive defense. Its key feature lies in the independent configuration of anomaly detection rules and alerting rules:
• Omnichannel reach: The backend monitors SPC anomaly detection and CPK/PPK process capability alerts in real time. Once a rule is triggered, the system can immediately push alarm information via email, WeChat Work, DingTalk, Lark, and MQTT interface.

• Closed-loop management: Personnel receiving alarms can directly register improvement measures in the system. This closed-loop model, from anomaly detection and message push to the recording of processing results, ensures that nursing measures are traceable and that the improvement process is clear and transparent.

Beyond basic statistics, we've introduced more cutting-edge tools to deeply mine the value of data. The MSA (Measurement System Analysis) module covers gauge linearity and bias studies, Gage R&R studies, and more, ensuring the stability and accuracy of the gauges themselves before statistical analysis. Simultaneously, the system innovatively integrates large models such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, enabling one-click intelligent interpretation of statistical results and assisting quality managers in quickly analyzing the causes of anomalies.
We are committed to helping enterprises build efficient digital quality systems with a lightweight architecture and extremely low technical barriers. By enabling data to "speak" and anomalies to be "detected in real time," we help China's manufacturing industry steadily move towards high-quality development.
SPC provides objective, quantifiable process capability data, demonstrating the stability and high standards of production quality.
It enhances customer confidence, especially for customers with high quality requirements (such as those in the automotive, auto parts, and electronic chip industries).
SPC is the "key" to entering high-end supply chains. Without implementing SPC, companies may not even be eligible to bid. Furthermore, customers tend to choose suppliers with stable processes because it saves them on inspection and management costs.
It reduces customer audit risks. A mature SPC implementation system leaves a professional and reliable impression on auditors. Successfully passing audits reduces the risk of customers demanding corrective action or even canceling orders.
Compared to companies that don't implement SPC, they are more likely to obtain better audit scores and higher order quotas. It also fosters long-term partnerships, making customers less inclined to switch suppliers easily.
Implementing SPC allows for real-time monitoring via control charts, with immediate alerts for any anomalies, minimizing the generation of batches of non-conforming products. This directly reduces raw material waste, labor waste, and the cost of handling scrap, while improving the first-pass yield.
By analyzing control charts and process capability indices, key variables affecting quality can be identified, thereby determining optimal production conditions. This reduces quality problems caused by parameter fluctuations, resulting in more stable and efficient production.
When the process is under statistical control, the need for full inspection of the final product can be reduced, replaced by more economical sampling inspection. This saves significant investment in manpower and inspection equipment.
When orders decrease, the "waiting time" for operators, technicians, or quality personnel increases. Sometimes, large-scale workforce optimization isn't feasible. Implementing SPC allows idle staff to learn SPC theory and participate in quality analysis and improvement processes, avoiding wasted human resources. This ensures employees can still create value for the company even with insufficient working hours, preparing for future order peaks.
SPC requires employees to learn statistical thinking, data collection, and problem-solving. Cultivating a core group of talent with data analysis and continuous improvement skills is an invaluable competitive advantage after economic recovery.
SPC provides objective data for problem analysis, rather than relying on experience or guesswork. This ensures management's improvement decisions are based on facts and data.
SPC can drive a shift in thinking from "producing products" to "producing qualified and stable products," cultivating a quality-conscious mindset across all employees. It improves the overall management level of the enterprise, laying the foundation for future automation and digital transformation.